There is no problem with who decides what should be marked. The problem is that the process of these decisions is not recorded, so future users of these marked databases will have no way of knowing in what context and how these markings were made. For example, a controversial situation may arise where the person who decides to mark the car feels that the following condition is mild damage,
but there may be others who think it is moderate to popular database severe damage. This situation may be problematic in the future. If the insurance company handling car accident claims does not understand the process of marking these data, they will completely trust the system's judgment, leading to the possibility of misjudgment. rl7wndxue03zh1238gpo69xrwxxgdc Photo Credit: Reuters / Dazhi Image Business Profit-Oriented Workflows:
The Consequences of Giving High Efficiency Marks Under Time Pressure In order to obtain more opportunities for labeling data, outsourcing companies will try to find a way to "uniform and standardize" the output labeling, and then the data labeling team will speculate on the purpose of the outsourcing company's people, and then decide all classification and labeling by themselves. Types, try to use the least amount of time to give the classification that matches the opponent's goal.